Jane Doe is found in Times Square with no memory and mysterious tattoos on her body. A woman with no memories of her past (Jane Doe), is found naked in Times Square with her body fully covered in intricate tattoos. Her discovery sets off a vast and complex mystery that immediately ignites the attention of the FBI, which begins to follow the road map of her tattoos into a larger conspiracy of crime, while bringing her closer to discovering the truth about her identity. I would like to blame the acting on the actor, but it just may be the director, or the writer. No, it's the actor. In any case the raw emotion from the lead male is usually nonsensical. He raves at his boss like a spoiled child, and acts bipolar most of the time. In real life that kind of behavior gets you fired, reassigned, or committed. I kind of feel sorry for Ms Alexander as she has been tasked to play a person who is highly functional, but has zero idea on who, what, when, why, how etc. Just how did they pitch this story and character to her to get her to sign off on this? The premise is interesting and unique, but the two main actors are a bit stiff. A woman who can't remember her past and with special skills (a la Jessi - Jamie Alexander's role in Kyle XY), and mix that with her being an outsider with critical information, via her tattoos (a la Michael Scofield in Prison Break), to future crimes and thereby becomes a de facto member of the FBI (a la Raymond Reddington in Blacklist) . <br/><br/>Make it worse by pushing the Hollywood agenda that wants us to believe we're all equal - a world where little women can kick the butts of guys twice their size, a lesbian black woman somehow merited being in charge of the unit (above every other qualified agent) and voila! Another piece of crap show whose sole purpose is to push a leftist wet dream of how the world should be.
Treveve replied
371 weeks ago